People v. Arnold
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. Frank H. Dunne, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
The defendant was convicted, after indictment, of the crime of grand larceny, and appeals from the judgment and the order denying her motion for a new trial.
In support of her claim that the defendant’s motion to set aside the indictment was improperly denied, the point is presented that no oath was especially administered to the person who acted as stenographic reporter for the grand jury before he entered upon the duty of reporting the testimony taken in the particular case of this defendant. The record of the proceedings had in the lower court upon the hearing of the motion to set aside the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. RodleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- People v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- People v. DelbosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- People v. WhalenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- People v. TellezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- People v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- People v. GrubbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- People v. RialCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.