People v. Delbos
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. A. Ruef, for Appellant. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, R. C. Van Fleet, and Lewis F. Byington, District Attorney, for Respondent.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of grand larceny and from an order denying her motion for a new trial.
It is claimed that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence. We think the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict. The charge was, that the defendant had on the twelfth day of December, 1902, stolen from one Maria Marquet the sum of four hundred dollars in money. The particular claim is made that the evidence does not show a larceny of the money, but an obtaining of the money by false pretenses. There was legal evidence tending to show that the defendant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. RaeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- People v. RaschkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- People v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- People v. De GraaffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by40 opinions
- People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- The People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. Nor WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.