Legal Opinion

City of Brainerd v. Brainerd Investments Partnership

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 13, 2013No. Nos. A11-0644, A11-1471PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILDEA, Chief Justice.

This case involves a resolution by respondent City of Brainerd (“City”) to expand a road and pay for a portion of the improvement with special assessments. Appellants Roger and Elizabeth Anda, and James H. Martin, LLC (“appellants”), who own property adjacent to the road to be improved, challenge the legality of a petition for the improvement submitted by Central Lakes College (“CLC”). Appellants argue that because CLC is an instrumentality of the State of Minnesota, and the State cannot be bound by special assessments of its property, CLC is not an “owner” of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Lienhard v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Marriage of Holmberg v. HolmbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  4. State v. CarufelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. Governmental Research Bureau, Inc. v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. RickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. State of Minnesota v. Thomas Raymond StruzykSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  3. Chad Nelson, Below v. Troy Schlener, Carla Brown, Below, Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. State v. ScovelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  5. State of Minnesota v. Jerry Expose, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API