City of Brainerd v. Brainerd Investments Partnership
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Chief Justice.
This case involves a resolution by respondent City of Brainerd (“City”) to expand a road and pay for a portion of the improvement with special assessments. Appellants Roger and Elizabeth Anda, and James H. Martin, LLC (“appellants”), who own property adjacent to the road to be improved, challenge the legality of a petition for the improvement submitted by Central Lakes College (“CLC”). Appellants argue that because CLC is an instrumentality of the State of Minnesota, and the State cannot be bound by special assessments of its property, CLC is not an “owner” of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Lienhard v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Marriage of Holmberg v. HolmbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. CarufelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Governmental Research Bureau, Inc. v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. RickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State of Minnesota v. Thomas Raymond StruzykSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Chad Nelson, Below v. Troy Schlener, Carla Brown, Below, Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State v. ScovelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- State of Minnesota v. Jerry Expose, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.