Legal Opinion
Fairlane Estates, Inc. v. Carrico Construction Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 19, 1964No. Civ. 7327PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.
The plaintiff, a corporation, was the owner of a tract of land; entered into a contract, allegedly with all of the defendants, viz., Carrico Construction Co., a corporation, George Lee Carrico, Lloyd Frimmersdorf, and Lloyd Frimmersdorf & Associates, dba Carrico Construction Co., a California corporation, for the subdivision and improvement thereof; and brought this action to recover damages for a failure to perform. The contract, which is dated December 7, 1960, recites that it is entered into between the plaintiff, as owner, and “Lloyd Frimmersdorf & Associates dba Carrico Construction Co.,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Mattei v. HopperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Amerson v. ChristmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Motown Record Corp. v. BrockertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Sea Ledge Properties, Inc. v. DodgeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Somerset Importers, Ltd. v. Continental VintnersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Greenamyer Engineering & Technology, Inc. v. Mediscan Research, Ltd. (In Re Mediscan Research, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.