Legal Opinion

Amerson v. Christman

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 6, 1968No. Civ. 11352PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRegan, Acting P. J.

These appeals arise out of a building construction contract. Defendant Christman agreed to construct a home for plaintiff Amerson for the sum of $24,594.92. Defendant Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, hereinafter called “Hartford,” was Christman’s surety under a performance bond. Defendant Department of Veterans’ Affairs, hereinafter called “Department,” supplied financing in the sum of $14,000. The trial court awarded damages to Amerson against Christman and Hartford in the amount of $11,931.62.

This ease involves four separate appeals. Amerson first appeals from the trial court’s…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Green Trees Enterprises, Inc. v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Rodriguez v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Bloom v. BenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cates Construction, Inc. v. Talbot PartnersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. American Home Assur. Co. v. Larkin Gen. Hosp., Ltd.Supreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. Guardianship of the Person & Estate of Smith v. Merchants Mutual Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. Hubbard v. State Farm Indemnity Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Davies MacHinery Co. v. Pine Mountain Club, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API