Beale v. City of Santa Barbara
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
In this action plaintiffs sought to have certain proceedings of the city council of Santa Barbara for doing the street work described in the resolution of intention adopted by said city council set aside and annulled, and to enjoin the superintendent of streets of said city from entering into a contract for the doing of the same. The cause of action is based upon the alleged insufficiency of the resolution of intention set out in the complaint, under which it is claimed the city council acquired no jurisdiction to do the work, and the alleged fact that plaintiffs’ property would not be…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Walston v. NevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Spring Street Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Blake v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- McNutt v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Anderson v. City of ParsonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- Domer v. CastatorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
- St. John v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.