St. John v. King
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
ATTERIDGE, J., pro tem.
Appellants, who were plaintiffs in the court below, attack the validity of certain street improvement proceedings of the council of the city of San Rafael, which had been taken under and pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Stats. 1911, p. 730) and the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 (Stats. 1915, p. 1441). By their action they sought to quiet their title to certain real property in the city of San Rafael against liens arising by virtue of the aforesaid proceedings in favor of certain named defendants on account of unpaid assessments for said improvement work, and also…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Dwyer v. City Council of the City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Chase v. KalberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Hall v. Fairchild-Gilmore-Wilton Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- San Francisco Sulphur Co. v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Louisiana Associated Gen. Contr. v. CalcasieuSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Johnston v. City of ClaremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Alexander v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- City of Spokane v. Catholic Bishop of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Dieruf v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.