Legal Opinion

Farmers T. Co. of Lanc. v. Bevis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 18, 1938No. Appeal, 85PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

While extensively obligated to plaintiff, Harry A. Bevis conveyed real estate through an intermediary to himself and wife as tenants by the entireties. Promptly thereafter plaintiff instituted the present suit to set aside the conveyance. After hearing, the court below decreed a reconveyance. Defendants thereupon took this appeal.

In 1914 Bevis bought a lot in Lancaster for $2,500 and took title in his own name. In 1915 he built a house upon it at a cost of $8,500, of which $5,000 was contributed by his wife’s father. Title to the premises remained continuously in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fidelity Trust Co. v. Union National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Peoples Savings & Dime Bank & Trust Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Queen-Favorite B. & L. Ass'n v. BursteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Burns v. Coyne Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Raub Supply Co. v. BrandtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Gleneagles Investment Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Joshua Slocum, Ltd. v. Boyle (In Re Joshua Slocum, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. First National Bank v. HoffinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Baker v. GeistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Morrison v. FarmerTexas Supreme Court · 1948

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API