Legal Opinion

Peoples Savings & Dime Bank & Trust Co. v. Scott

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 27, 1931No. Appeal, 94PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

In May, 1926, the defendant, Edward B. Scott, conveyed a house and lot in Scranton to his wife, Mary G. Scott, also a defendant, the title passing through the name of a third party. At the time, Scott’s liabilities, partly contingent, amounted to approximately $11,000, four thousand of which was as endorser on notes held by the plaintiff bank. Both under the general law (12 R. C. L. 498) and under the statute (see Act of May 21, 1921, P. L. 1045, 1046, concerning Fraudulent Conveyances, etc.) a contingent liability has the same status as one that is fixed. Some…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kehr v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. American Trust Co. v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Estate of HauerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  4. Heiges v. PiferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. Shaver v. MowrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Fidelity Trust Co. v. Union National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Feist v. DruckermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  3. Makransky v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
  4. Marko v. MendelowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. First National Bank v. HoffinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API