Legal Opinion

Queen-Favorite B. & L. Ass'n v. Burstein

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 8, 1932No. Appeal, 319PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

Appellant conveyed, for a nominal consideration, several pieces of real estate to his wife and son, and, through his mother-in-law, to his wife and himself as tenants by entirety. He was contingently liable on a bond to appellee in the amount of $30,000. Proceedings were instituted by appellee to have the conveyances set aside because they were made for the purpose of hindering, de laying and defrauding creditors, among whom was appellee. A decree pro eonfesso was opened and the case heard on bill and answer, appellee offering only such parts of his bill as made…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Peoples Savings & Dime Bank & Trust Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. American Trust Co. v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. American Trust Co. v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Jarvis v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Reehling v. ByersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. Gleneagles Investment Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Feist v. DruckermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  3. Hyman v. Porter (In Re Porter)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1984
  4. First National Bank v. HoffinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Iscovitz v. FildermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API