First National Bank v. Hoffines

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

The principal issue on this appeal is whether, under §4 of the Fraudulent Conveyance Act,1 two separate conveyances of realty, seven months apart, by the endorser of a demand note to his wife and himself as tenants by the entireties are deemed fraudulent as to the holder of such note.2

One William Coller, between 1954 and April 1959, owned a gasoline service station in Marietta, Lancaster County, and, during that period, made various loans at the First National Bank of Marietta (Bank) upon demand notes wherein Paul Hoffines (Hoffines), Coller’s brother-in-law, was…