Morrison v. Farmer

This suit was brought by respondent against petitioner for the enforcement of a parol contract for the purchase of an improved lot in the city of Dallas, or to impress a trust. After trial before a jury, judgment was rendered for respondent and that judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals, which held that a resulting- trust in favor of respondent arose out of the transactions between the parties. 210 S. W. (2d) 245.

The facts found by the jury and those shown by undisputed evidence are in substance as follows: Sears, Roebuck & Company, being the owner of a house in which respondent…