Hoerr v. Hoerr
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Blue Earth county. The referees appointed for the partition of certain real property reported and defendants filed objections to the confirmation of the report. The matter was heard before Comstock, J., who confirmed the report and ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff upon paying certain charges and fees. From the decree of partition entered pursuant to the order for judgment, defendants appealed.
Read the full summary
Action in the district court for Blue Earth county. The referees appointed for the partition of certain real property reported and defendants filed objections to the confirmation of the report. The matter was heard before Comstock, J., who confirmed the report and ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff upon paying certain charges and fees. From the decree of partition entered pursuant to the order for judgment, defendants appealed. Section 82, c. 108, B. S. 1849 Wisconsin, and section 49, c. 75, B. S. 1851 Minnesota, seem to be substantially the same as G. S. 1913, § 8038. Chapter 75 contains…
1Opinion of the Court
On December 7, 1917, the following opinion was filed:
Dibell, C.
This is an action of partition. The referees recommended a division of the property among the co-owners and an award of compensation to make equality. The report was confirmed over the objections of the defendants. From the final judgment the defendants appeal. .
I. The plaintiff and the defendants were the owners in common of city property in Mankato and nearby farm property. The judgment divides the property among the owners and charges the shares set off to certain of the defendants with owelty to equalize partition. It is "the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jameson v. RixeySupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
- Sawin v. OsbornSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
- Ames v. AmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Hurley v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Field v. LeiterIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Swogger v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Hoverson v. HoversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Bagg v. OsbornSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Schoonmaker v. St. Paul Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Leach v. LeachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.