Legal Opinion

Schoonmaker v. St. Paul Title & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 5, 1922No. 22,703PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

Action to determine adverse claims to a vacant lot in the city of St. Paul. There were findings in plaintiff’s favor. The defendant James M. Millett has appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial. Plaintiff claims title by virtue of two deeds from the city of St. Paul, executed after a sale under special assessment judgments. The validity of plaintiff’s claim is questioned on several grounds:

Notice of application for the entry of the judgments was given by publication, under the provisions of the charter of St. Paul, adopted in 1900 and amended in 1904. Section 267…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Virtue v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  3. McFarland v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Pioneer Savings & Loan Co. v. BartschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  5. D'Autremont v. Anderson Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Swogger v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Simonds v. Norwich Union Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  4. Searles v. SearlesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Bolsta v. BremerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API