Legal Opinion

Leach v. Leach

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 11, 1926No. Nos. 25,311, 25,312PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Action in partition. A city lot with a dwelling house thereon is involved. Plaintiff is the wife of defendant Frank Boland Leach. The property was conveyed to them as joint tenants. The husband bought the lot in May, 1912, for $550. In the same year a house was built thereon at a cost of about $2,350, of which $2,000 was procured from defendant Mary Leach, the mother of the husband, as disclosed in Leach v. Leach, 162 Minn. 159, 202 N. W. 448. The property was occupied as a home by plaintiff and her husband until about December 1, 1921, when she left her husband. Thereafter she unsuccessfully…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ruhl v. Kauffman & RungeTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Kaser v. HaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  3. Fenton v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Prohl v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Alleman v. HawleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Heslip v. HeslipIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  2. American Railway Express Co. v. HouleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Edwards v. EdwardsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. R.E.R. v. J.G.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Proudley v. Fidelity & Guaranty Fire Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API