Legal Opinion

Luikart v. Heelan

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1939No. 30468PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

An equity action was brought by the receiver of the *493Commercial State Bank, of Florence, Douglas county, against some eleven stockholders of said bank to require them to contribute and pay, by virtue of the Constitution and laws of Nebraska, the double liability upon the shares of stock owned by them in said bank. The district court found for the plaintiff, and entered judgment against Fred A. Guggenmos for $300, William J. Hotz, $500, and Fred Armbrust, $1,000, each with interest. Motion for new trial was overruled, and supersedeas bonds were duly filed by Fred Armbrust and William J. Hotz.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coombes v. GetzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Luikart v. HigginsNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  3. State ex rel. Spillman v. Citizens State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Department of Banking v. FoeNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Henry v. AlexanderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lincoln Joint Stock Land Bank v. BarnesNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Gibson v. Koutsky-Brennan-Vana Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  3. State ex rel. Spillman v. Commercial State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. of Washington v. EnstenessSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Luikart v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API