Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Spillman v. Citizens State Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1929No. 26774PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

The problem for solution presented by this appeal is the proper distribution of a fund arising from the enforcement of the constitutional double liability of stockholders of an insolvent state bank.

Citizens State Bank of Royal became insolvent, and in receivership proceedings its affairs have been wound up and its assets distributed. The claims of depositors have been paid from the depositors’ guaranty fund. The assets of the bank were insufficient, by the amount of more than $19,000, to reimburse the guaranty fund. There are allowed and unpaid claims of general creditors in excess *339of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. FunkNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Eaton v. HastyNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  3. State v. Farmers State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1919
  4. State v. German Savings BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Bodie v. PollockNebraska Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gaiser v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Luikart v. HigginsNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Luikart v. BuckNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. PersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Parker v. LuehrmannNebraska Supreme Court · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API