Legal Opinion

Luikart v. Jones

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1940No. 30862Published

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

This is an action to recover double liability from stockholders of the Bank of Benkelman by the receiver of that bank, as formerly provided by section 7, art. XII of the Constitution, which was repealed November 8, 1938. After trial the action was dismissed as to the defendants, and they were allowed to go hence without day, from which plaintiff appealed.

The plaintiff’s amended petition, filed December 3, 1938, alleges that the Bank of Benkelman was organized September 1, 1887, and given charter No. 38. On March 17, 1932, the bank having been adjudged insolvent, E. H. Luikart, plaintiff, was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brown v. O'KEEFESupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Foust v. Munson Steamship LinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Maynard v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Ward v. JoslinSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Peoples Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API