Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Spillman v. Commercial State Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1943No. 31537PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

This is an appeal by intervener William J. Hotz from an order of the trial court dismissing both causes of action in his petition of intervention filed, in these proceedings on May 25, 1940, praying for an injunction, accounting, judgment, decree of set-off and other equitable relief. The injunctive feature is to restrain the enforcement of a judgment against intervener for bank stockholders’ liability (Luikart v. Heelan, 136 Neb. 492, 286 N. W. 780) until offset could be adjudicated on his two causes of action. After the filing of the petition of intervention, motions and demurrers filed by…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Follmer v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Witters v. SowlesUnited States Circuit Court · 1887
  3. Brandeen v. BealeNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Solomon v. A. W. Farney, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Luikart v. HigginsNebraska Supreme Court · 1936

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Emry v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. DickinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Grosvenor v. GrosvenorNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Gerard v. SteinbockNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Contois Motor Co. v. SaltzNebraska Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API