Legal Opinion

Department of Banking v. Foe

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1939No. 30611PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Messmore, j.

This is an appeal in a garnishment proceeding from an order of the district court for Lancaster county, entered October 12, 1938, the court ordering the garnishee, Continental National Bank, to pay into court the sum of $44.24, and the state auditor to pay into court the sum of $125, constituting 10 per cent, of the third quarterly salary due the defendant, a state railway commissioner. The motion of defendant Good for exemptions as head of a family was sustained. Motion for a new trial was overruled. Defendant Good appeals.

Counsel in their briefs detail the history of previous…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Coombes v. GetzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Hodges v. SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Cavender v. HewittTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  4. State ex rel. Baughn v. UreNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Ruperich v. BaehrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. May v. City of KearneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Wilson v. WaltersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State v. MunnNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Jessen v. JessenNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Town of Wauwatosa v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API