Andrew J. McBarron v. S & T Industries, Inc., Master Hourly Retirement Plan and S & T Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by an employer, S & T Industries, Inc. and by the employer’s pension plan, the “Master Hourly Retirement Plan,” from a ruling by the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. The issue presented is whether a key portion of the retirement plan, Section 4.06(b), violates sections of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., which prevent an employee from forfeiting retirement benefits earned through an approved retirement plan. The employer contends that the employee, Andrew McBarron, was not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gutting v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1982
3Cited by48 opinions
- De Nobel v. Vitro Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. William M. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Ronald Adcock, Cross v. The Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Corum v. Farm Credit ServicesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
- Bradley v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.