Legal Opinion

Andrew J. McBarron v. S & T Industries, Inc., Master Hourly Retirement Plan and S & T Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 19, 1985No. 84-5299PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by an employer, S & T Industries, Inc. and by the employer’s pension plan, the “Master Hourly Retirement Plan,” from a ruling by the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. The issue presented is whether a key portion of the retirement plan, Section 4.06(b), violates sections of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., which prevent an employee from forfeiting retirement benefits earned through an approved retirement plan. The employer contends that the employee, Andrew McBarron, was not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Gutting v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1982

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. De Nobel v. Vitro Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. William M. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  3. Ronald Adcock, Cross v. The Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  4. Corum v. Farm Credit ServicesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
  5. Bradley v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API