Legal Opinion
De Nobel v. Vitro Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided October 17, 1989No. 88-3104PublishedCited by 240 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge:
Richard W. de Nobel and fifteen other retired employees of the Vitro Corporation (Vitro) appeal the summary judgment dis missal of their claims against Vitro under various provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. In their amended complaint, the retirees claimed that the administrators of Vitro’s ERISA-qualified retirement benefits trust miscalculated the amounts payable under the express terms of the retirement plan to “early retirees” electing to receive their benefits in a lump sum, rather than in a stream of…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by240 opinions
- Fred Brown v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Max W. Perry v. Simplicity Engineering, a Division of Lukens General Industries, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Kenneth E. Wildbur, Sr. v. Arco Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Maria H. Pinto v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Drexel Finley and Grace Finley v. Special Agents Mutual Benefit Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
235 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.