Ronald Adcock, Cross v. The Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, Cross
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOINER, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs are non-union salaried employees who worked in defendants’ LaVergne, Tennessee tire plant (“the plant”) at the time of the plant’s sale to Bridgestone Tire and Rubber Company (“Bridgestone”). Plaintiffs brought this action pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq., to recover, on account of the sale, reduction in force (“RIF”) termination pay under defendants’ termination pay plan. The district court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment based on the ground that defendants’ determination that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Blau v. Del Monte Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- York v. First Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Princeton University v. SchmidSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Daniel v. Eaton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Gary Arnett v. Gary T. Myers, Executive Director of the Tennessee Wildlife Resources AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Cloverdale Equipment Company v. Simon Aerials, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Hugh Edwards v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Albert Van Boxel, Cross-Appellee v. The Journal Company Employees' Pension Trust, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.