People v. Burroughs
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*1404Opinion
COFFEE, J. —
A recommitment under the mentally disordered offender (MDO) law requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt that (1) the patient has a severe mental disorder; (2) the disorder “is not in remission or cannot be kept in remission without treatment”; and (3) by reason of that disorder, the patient represents a substantial danger of physical harm to others. (Pen. Code, § 2970.)1 The Legislature has provided that a patient “ ‘cannot be kept in remission without treatment’ if during the year prior to the question being before the Board of Prison Terms or a trial court, he or she has…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re QawiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. Howard N.California Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. FrancisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. BeesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- (HC)Caridad v. BlackDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- People v. BurroughsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.