Legal Opinion

People v. Fisher

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 2006No. B181560PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

YEGAN, Acting P. J.

Todd Fisher appeals from a jury verdict declaring him to be a mentally disordered offender (MDO) within the meaning of Penal Code section 2960 et seq. As we shall explain, appellant has made some poor choices. All mental health professionals agree that appellant is an MDO. Appellant himself told the jury that he lives in “la la land” and is “crazy.” He also told the jury: “I have a mental disorder.” These candid admissions, his failure to participate in any treatment at Atascadero State Hospital, his waiver of the right to counsel, his insistence on the right to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. People v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. DuranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People v. TuilaepaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. VanceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API