Legal Opinion

People v. Burroughs

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 16, 2005No. B178524Published

1Opinion of the Court

32 Cal.Rptr.3d 729 (2005)

131 Cal.App.4th 1401

The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

Dacosta BURROUGHS, Defendant and Respondent.

No. B178524.

Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Six.

August 16, 2005.

Gerald T. Shea, District Attorney, and Sandra L. Mitchell, San Luis Obispo, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Richard B. Lennon, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent.

COFFEE, J.

A recommitment under the mentally disordered offender (MDO) law requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt that (1) the patient has a severe mental disorder; (2) the disorder "is not…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. In Re QawiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. RoderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. People v. Howard N.California Supreme Court · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API