Legal Opinion

People v. Howard N.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 2005No. S123722PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

Welfare and Institutions Code 1 section 1800 et seq. delineates procedures governing the extended detention of dangerous persons. In particular, it provides for the civil commitment of a person at the time he would otherwise be discharged by statute from a Youth Authority commitment. We consider whether this extended detention scheme violates due process because it does not expressly require a finding that the person’s mental deficiency, disorder, or abnormality causes serious difficulty in controlling behavior. 2

We conclude the extended detention scheme should be interpreted…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. People v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. People v. KrebsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  3. People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Bell v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. People v. Lemanuel C.California Supreme Court · 2007

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API