People v. Howard N.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN, J.
Welfare and Institutions Code 1 section 1800 et seq. delineates procedures governing the extended detention of dangerous persons. In particular, it provides for the civil commitment of a person at the time he would otherwise be discharged by statute from a Youth Authority commitment. We consider whether this extended detention scheme violates due process because it does not expressly require a finding that the person’s mental deficiency, disorder, or abnormality causes serious difficulty in controlling behavior. 2
We conclude the extended detention scheme should be interpreted…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- People v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. KrebsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Bell v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- People v. Lemanuel C.California Supreme Court · 2007
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.