State v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This court has often stated that “the determination of disputed factual situations is within the final jurisdiction of the Industrial Commission, and subject to correction by action in mandamus only upon a showing of abuse of discretion.” State, ex rel. Haines, v. Indus. Comm. (1972), 29 Ohio St. 2d 15, 16. See, also, State, ex rel. Reed, v. Indus. Comm. (1965), 2 Ohio St. 2d 200; State, ex rel. Allied Wheel Products, v. Indus. Comm. (1956), 166 Ohio St. 47. Furthermore, where the record contains some evidence which supports the commission’s factual findings, those findings will not be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Haines v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Anderson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State ex rel. G F Business Equipment, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State ex rel. Humble v. Mark Concepts, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1979
- State ex rel. Reed v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State ex rel. Paragon v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. StoverOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State ex rel. Hughes v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- State ex rel. General Refractories Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State ex rel. Hudson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.