Piazzini v. Jessup
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BRAZIL, J. pro tem. *
The plaintiffs, as buyers of a house from the defendants, began this action by a complaint which asked for rescission, damages and an injunction against the sellers to prevent them from selling the house because of default. Judgment was entered for plaintiffs for damages; and an injunction was granted as prayed for; from which judgment the defendant sellers have appealed.
Mr. and Mrs. Jessup, as owners of a house in Redwood City, listed it in June 1953, with a multiple real estate listing service for sale, the size of the lot being then described as 55 by 100 feet. A real…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Andrews v. California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Kennedy v. IsenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Younis v. HartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Garland v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Mills v. HellingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Dugan v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Miles v. Perpetual Savings & Loan Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1979
- Weintraub v. KrobatschSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Peine v. MurphyHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
- Cousineau v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.