Legal Opinion

Mills v. Hellinger

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1950No. Civ. 17865PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMeCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of plaintiff after trial before the court without a jury in an action to recover a deposit of $6,750 paid on account of the purchase price of a parcel of real property, defendants Kateb and Hellinger appeal.

The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff (respondent) (Estate of Isenberg, 63 Cal.App.2d 214, 216 [146 P.2d 424]), the material facts are:

On September 28, 1948, in response to an advertisement-appearing in the Los Angeles Times, plaintiff attended an auction of real property conducted by George M. Kateb for and on behalf of his principal,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Kennedy v. IsenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Eichelberger v. Mills Land & Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908
  4. Robins v. HopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Quarg v. ScherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Alfaro v. Community Housing Improvement System & Planning Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Pinney & Topliff v. Chrysler CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1959
  4. Piazzini v. JessupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Richard v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API