Garland v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
Plaintiff instituted this action to recover from defendant a balance of $591.21 alleged to be due for the performance of certain work provided for by the terms of a contract entered into between the parties and for the reasonable value of additional work performed by plaintiff which was not included in the contract. The defendant filed an answer containing a general denial of all allegations of the complaint and a cross-complaint whereby he sought to recover from plaintiff the sum of $315 on account of a promissory note in this amount executed by plaintiff to defendant as payee and an…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kaufman v. ShainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Hulen v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Anglo-California Trust Co. v. Oakland RailwaysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Schroder v. Aden Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- De Jarnatt v. MarquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Piazzini v. JessupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Darlington v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Rossi v. ZappaterraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Karl Sitte Plumbing Co. v. Darby Development Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.