Legal Opinion

Younis v. Hart

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 8, 1943No. Civ. 14011PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment of rescission on account of their alleged fraud in the sale of real and personal property. Their contentions though otherwise expressed are encompassed within the following: The evidence does not support the findings and the findings do not support the judgment; the notice of rescission is inadequate ; plaintiffs were guilty of laches; and the judgment does not dispose of the case completely.

Prom the findings we glean the story that culminated in this appeal. On December 11, 1941, defendants, husband and wife, were the owners of lots H and 24, two adjacent…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. French v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Munson v. FishburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Davis v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Dow v. SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Neff v. EnglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Nathanson v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Dermot A. Nee and Antoinette K. Nee v. Joseph v. Dillon and Lois B. DillonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  3. Piazzini v. JessupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Kantlehner v. BiscegliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Richard v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API