Legal Opinion
Janney v. Mills
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 10, 2013No. C 12-3919 PJHPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*809ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART AND DENYING IT IN PART
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.
Defendant’s motion to dismiss the first amended complaint came on for hearing before this court on May 1, 2013. Plaintiffs appeared by their counsel Stephen Gardner, and defendant appeared by its counsel Charles C. Sipos and David T. Biderman. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, the court hereby GRANTS the motion in part and DENIES it in part.
BACKGROUND
In this proposed class action, plaintiffs allege that the product…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Theodore C. Swartz v. Kpmg Llp, and Presidio Advisory Services Inc. Deutsche Bank Ag Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Yourish v. California AmplifierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brady v. Bayer Corp., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Gustavson v. Wrigley Sales Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Bruton v. Gerber Products Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Gedalia v. Whole Foods Market Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
- Krzykwa v. Campbell Soup Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.