Legal Opinion
Joe Turner v. Charles H. Lundquist
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 7, 1967No. 21091_1PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COPPLE, District Judge:
This action was brought for monetary relief based on alleged violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Sec. 78j(b)); Rule X-10B-5 of the Rules and Regulations of Securities Exchange Commission (17 C.F.R. 240.10B-51); and Section 17 (a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S. C. Sec. 77q); plaintiff-appellant Turner likewise contends that he is entitled to damages for fraud and deceit under California State Law. Jurisdiction is based on 15 U.S.C. Sec. 78aa and 15 U.S.C. Sec. 77v.
On January 3, 1961, Turner purchased a $125,000…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Edgar Robert Errion, Also Known as E. R. Errion and Bob Errion Amy Errion, Violet Kellerstraus, and C. W. Williamson v. Marguerite L. ConnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- J. Bryant Kasey and Maryann Kasey v. Molybdenum Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Globus v. Law Research Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Friedman v. JablonskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Vanderboom v. SextonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Valerio v. Boise Cascade Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1978
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,758 George T. Hupp v. Laurence Gray, an Individual, and A. G. Becker and Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.