Legal Opinion
Nighbert v. First National Bank of Bakersfield
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 27, 1938No. Civ. 1888PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This is an action for damages for fraud and deceit. The action was commenced on October 24, 1933, and this appeal is from a judgment following an order sustaining general and special demurrers to a fourth amended complaint. This order included the following:
“It further appearing that the causes of action, if any ever existed, are barred by the Statute of Limitations, the demurrers are sustained without leave to amend and the action is dismissed.”
The complaint in question contains ninety-six causes of action. Except for a variation as to the number of shares purchased and amounts paid by the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Niles v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Anderson v. DerrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Original Mining & Milling Co. v. CasadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Haley v. Santa Fe Land Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Sutter v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Allen v. RamsayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Vertex Investment Co. v. SchwabacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Adams v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Bartlett v. Pacific National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.