Legal Opinion

Guerin v. Kirst

California Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1949No. L. A. 20687PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to recover possession of a' certain Caterpillar tractor, or its value, together- with ■ damages-for its detention by defendant, who claimed as an innocent purchaser. The case was tried before a jury, which rejected plaintiffs’ demand in ioto and returned a verdict in favor of defendant. Prom the judgment accordingly entered and the order denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, plaintiffs appeal.

As their principal ground for reversal, plaintiffs challenge the sufficiency of the evidence, particularly as related to the federal Emergency…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Andrews v. California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Field v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Holm v. BramwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Oakland Bank of Savings v. California Pressed Brick Co.California Supreme Court · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Crestline Mobile Homes Manufacturing Co. v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Lamb Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Langley v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Higgins v. GuerinArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Owens v. PyeattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API