Legal Opinion

Avery v. Fredericksen and Westbrook

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1944No. Civ. 7079PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.

Appellant Avery, and respondents Fredericksen and Westbrook, a copartnership, entered into a contract which recited that the latter had entered into a contract with the United States War Department which required the use of material (granite sand) believed to be available on land owned by Avery; that ■ ‘ ‘ Owner grants to Contractor the right to enter upon the property and to remove, and the Contractor agrees to remove, therefrom such quantities of the material as Contractor may require in the performance of its said Contract”; that “Contractor agrees to pay to Owner, and Owner agrees to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Perkins v. BlauthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Green v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Salstrom v. Orleans Bar Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Coburn v. California Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  5. De Costa v. Massachusetts Flat Water & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1861

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Coughlin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Basin Oil Co. v. Baash-Ross Tool Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Mozzetti v. City of BrisbaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Pepitone v. RussoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Estate of De LaveagaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API