Legal Opinion
Bell v. Hettleman
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 31, 1983No. Civ. K-82-2369PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK A. KAUFMAN, Chief Judge.
On August 13, 1982, plaintiffs filed a complaint against the Secretary of the Maryland Department of Human Resources (DHR), (the state defendant), individually and in his official capacity, charging that the method used by that state agency to compute eligibility and the amount of benefits to be paid under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program violates Federal statutes and regulations, because the state defendant considers man-datorily withheld taxes (state, local and federal income taxes and Social Security or Federal Insurance Contributions…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lewis v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Shea v. VialpandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Van Lare v. HurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Solman Ex Rel. Gosman v. ShapiroDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1969
- Gilliard v. CraigDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Turner v. ProdCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Bell v. MassingaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Ram v. BlumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Bell v. MassingaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Clark v. HelmsDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.