Legal Opinion

Turner v. Prod

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 10, 1983No. Nos. 82-4552, 82-4566, 82-4567 and 82-4599PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:

In a case of first impression,1 the State of California and the federal Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) appeal a grant of partial summary judgment against them and in favor of a state-wide class of workers receiving Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). The plaintiff class contends that the income used to calculate a welfare family’s needs has never, and does not now, include the funds mandatorily deducted from a worker’s paycheck for such items as income taxes because that money is never available to such families for the support of their…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Heckler v. TurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Preston v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. Estate of Hernandez v. Bd. of RegentsArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Brothers v. First LeasingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Charlotte Kennedy and Robert L. Kennedy v. Collagen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API