Van Lare v. Hurley
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan
The question presented is whether New York regulations reducing pro rata the shelter allowance provided recipients of Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) to the extent there are nonpaying lodgers liv*340ing in the household conflict with the Social Security Act and federal regulations. We conclude that the state provisions conflict with federal law and are therefore invalid. King v. Smith, 392 U. S. 309 (1968); Lewis v. Martin, 397 U. S. 552 (1970); Townsend v. Swank, 404 U. S. 282 (1971).
I
AFDC is a categorical public assistance program established by the Social Security Act of 1935.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Townsend v. SwankSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lewis v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by145 opinions
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Schweiker v. Gray PanthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Heckler v. TurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.