Shea v. Vialpando
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Powell
In administering the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program of the Social Security Act of 1935, as amended (Act), 42 U. S. C. § 601 et seq., state agencies are required by § 402 (a) (7) of the Act, 81 Stat. 881, 42 U. S. C. §602 (a)(7), to “take into consideration . . . any expenses reasonably attributable to the earning of . . . income.” Such employment-related expenses are deducted from an AFDC applicant's- income in the process of determining eligibility for assistance. We granted certiorari, 414 U. S. 999 (1973), to determine whether, in light of § 402 (a)(7), a State may…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by237 opinions
- Maher v. GagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Schweiker v. Gray PanthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Philbrook v. GlodgettSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bowen v. GilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
232 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.