Clark v. Helms
District Court, D. New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DEVINE, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff class brings this action and attacks the method used by defendant to calculate Aid to Families with Dependent Children (“AFDC”) 1 benefits. Plaintiffs also attack defendants’ alleged failure to adequately notify AFDC recipients of cases involving intended actions to terminate or reduce benefits. Plaintiffs seek injunctive and declaratory relief. 2 Plaintiffs found jurisdiction upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343(3). Both parties move for summary judgment regarding the calculation of AFDC benefits. 3 The motions do not address plaintiffs’ complaint of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Philbrook v. GlodgettSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. RutherfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Shea v. VialpandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- New Hampshire Retirement System v. SununuSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Schroeder v. HegstromDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1984
- Pino v. Beech Hill HospitalDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1999