Legal Opinion

Ram v. Blum

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 17, 1983No. 82 Civ. 372 (RJW)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.

This action challenges the legality of the method that the State of New York' has determined to employ in calculating benefits to be paid to eligible New York families under the federal Aid to Families with Dependent Children (“AFDC”) program. The State of New York has determined to treat the amounts mandatorily deducted from the paychecks of employed family members, e.g. amounts withheld for federal and state taxes and Federal Insurance Contributions Act (“FICA”) obligations, as “income” to be taken into account in calculating the amount of an eligible family’s…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Power Reactor Development Co. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Turner v. ProdCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Schroeder v. HegstromDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1984
  3. Clark v. HelmsDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1983
  4. Kelly on Behalf of Lofstock v. PeralesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  5. Dickenson v. PetitDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API