Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Disciplinary Action Against Lundeen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 21, 2012No. A11-0896PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for disciplinary action against respondent Steven Paul Lundeen on May 16, 2011, alleging four counts of professional misconduct, including misappropriation of client funds, failure to pay a law-related debt, failure to return unearned fees, client neglect, making false statements, and failure to cooperate with the disciplinary process. Lundeen failed to file an answer to this petition.

On May 31, 2011, the Director filed a supplementary petition for disciplinary ac*605tion against Lundeen, alleging two…

3Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RebeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. In re Disciplinary Action Against FairbairnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by49 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Mark Alan GREENMAN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 228990Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  2. In re Disciplinary Action Against TigueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  3. In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. In re Disciplinary Action Against VossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  5. In re Disciplinary Action Against TaplinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API