Legal Opinion

Jolley v. General Motors Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1982No. 8127SC378PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Plaintiff assigns as error the court’s granting of defendant’s motion for directed verdict. In determining whether a motion for directed verdict should be granted, the non-movant’s evidence must be taken as true and considered in the light most favorable to him; a directed verdict is properly granted if and only if the evidence is insufficient to justify a verdict for the nonmovant. Hawks v. Brindle, 51 N.C. App. 19, 275 S.E. 2d 277 (1981). In the present case, the plaintiff’s evidence must be examined to determine if it would be sufficient to support a verdict for either…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cockerham v. WardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Plouffe v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  3. Hawks v. BrindleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. O'QUINN v. SouthardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Oliver Ex Rel. Oliver v. RoyallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Red Hill Hosiery Mill, Inc. v. Magnetek, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Sandra Ruffin Catherine Ruffin, by and Through Her Guardian Ad Litem, C. Timothy Williford v. Shaw Industries, Incorporated Sherwin-Williams CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  3. Seaside Resorts, Inc. v. Club Car, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Byrd Motor Lines, Inc. v. Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Carlton v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API