Legal Opinion

O'QUINN v. Southard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1967No. 200PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

This appeal presents the question whether the trial judge erred in overruling defendants’ motions for nonsuit, i. e., whether all the evidence, considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff, is sufficient to establish defendants’ actionable negligence. Hubbard v. Oil Co., 268 N.C. 489, 151 S.E. 2d 71.

Plaintiff offered no evidence as to what ignited the gasoline. Neither Southard, nor plaintiff, nor Messer (the only three persons on the premises) was smoking; no one struck a match; no tool was dropped on the concrete to create a spark. Both plaintiff and Messer insisted most positively…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Springs v. . DollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Ridge v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Etheridge v. . EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Etheridge v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Starks Food Markets, Inc. v. El Dorado Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Husketh v. Convenient Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Schaffner v. Cumberland County Hospital System, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Sparks v. Oxy-Health, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
  4. Page v. SloanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Jolley v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API