Legal Opinion
Fox v. Mize
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 18, 2018No. Case Number: 116489PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
(a) in giving improper or ambiguous orders of [sic] in failing to make proper regulations; or(b) in the employment of improper persons or instrumentalities in work involving risk of harm to others:(c) in the supervision of the activity; or(d) in permitting, or failing to prevent, negligent or other tortious conduct by persons, whether or not his servants or agents, upon premises or with instrumentalities under his control.8
Particularly relevant to the case before us, comment h to § 213 provides:
h . Concurrent negligence of master and servant. In addition to liability under the rule stated in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Dayton Hudson Corp. v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Specialty Beverages, L.L.C v. Pabst Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Schovanec v. Archdiocese of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- TULSA AMBULATORY PROCEDURE CENTER v. OLMSTEADSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2024
- TULSA AMBULATORY PROCEDURE CENTER v. OLMSTEADSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2024
- Bird v. Millis Limitless Transportation LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2025
- CTC Inc v. Schneider National Carriers IncDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2021
- Cox v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2019
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.