State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Giger
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, V.C.J.
{1 In these disciplinary proceedings against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: (1) Does the record submitted for our examination provide sufficient evidence for a meaningful de novo consideration of the merits and disposition of both the motion for additional discipline and of the complaint? 1 and (2) Is a suspension from the practice of law for two years and one day an appropriate disciplinary sanction for respondent's breach of professional ethics? We answer both questions in the affirmative.
I
INTRODUCTION TO THE RECORD
2 On 13 November 2001 the court held in State ex rel.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FarrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. WhitebookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DobbsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. DEMOPOLOSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. KNIGHTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.