Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Giger

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 10, 2003No. SCBD 4529, 4734PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, V.C.J.

{1 In these disciplinary proceedings against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: (1) Does the record submitted for our examination provide sufficient evidence for a meaningful de novo consideration of the merits and disposition of both the motion for additional discipline and of the complaint? 1 and (2) Is a suspension from the practice of law for two years and one day an appropriate disciplinary sanction for respondent's breach of professional ethics? We answer both questions in the affirmative.

I

INTRODUCTION TO THE RECORD

2 On 13 November 2001 the court held in State ex rel.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FarrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. WhitebookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DobbsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  4. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. DEMOPOLOSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  5. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. KNIGHTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API