Andrew v. Depani-Sparkes
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
CERTIORARI PREVIOUSLY GRANTED; OPINION OF THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS VACATED; ORDER OF THE DISTRICT COURT REVERSED; CAUSE REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS
EDMONDSON, J.
¶ 1 Plaintiffs filed an action in the District Court alleging defendants’ negligence relating to the prenatal care and birth of plaintiffs’ child. That court granted summary judgment to defendant Mercy Health Center and plaintiffs appealed. Plaintiffs argue the trial court did not apply a correct standard for causation and failed to recognize the testimony from their expert witnesses. Mercy argues the tidal court correctly…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Quiet Technology DC-8, Inc., Quiet Technology, Inc. v. Hurel-Dubois UK LTD.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Weisgram v. Marley Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- FARLEY v. CITY OF CLAREMORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 v. HOFMEISTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- SHAWAREB v. SSM HEALTH CARE OF OKLAHOMASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- BEYRER v. THE MULESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
- PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE CO. v. POPESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.