Legal Opinion

Seamans Oil Co. v. Davis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 11, 1922No. 10771PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court, Washington County; Preston A. Shinn, Judge. .Action by J. C. Davis and W. E. Mitchell, partners, doing business under firm name of Davis & Mitchell against the Seamans Oil Company to foreclose meeh¿nic’s lien, etc. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

This action was commenced in the district court -of Washington county by defendant in error against the plaintiff in error to recover $1,063.50, balance due for drilling and cleaning out a well, and to foreclose a mechanic’s lien filed upon the oil and gas lease held by defendant. At the time of the institution of this suit the defendant in error caused an attachment to be issued and levied upon property not covered by the mechanic’s lien. The case was tried to the jury, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for the full amount claimed. The parties then submitted the question…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alva Roller Mills v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. National Bank of Hastings v. Oklahoma State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Meyer v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Seamans Oil Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Abraham v. GelwickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Packard Oklahoma Motor Co. v. FunkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Simpson v. PlummerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Dills v. CallowaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Clark v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API